Denmark PM says ‘you cannot spy against an ally’ following reports of US spying on Greenland
In May 2025, Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made headlines when she addressed reports that the United States was allegedly gathering intelligence on Greenland. Her emphatic statement, “you cannot spy against an ally,” echoed the sentiments of many who believe in the importance of maintaining trust and cooperation between allied nations. This incident surfaced during a period marked by tension following former President Donald Trump’s well-documented interest in purchasing Greenland—a proposal that was met with firm resistance from Danish leaders.
In the wake of Trump’s comments, Prime Minister Frederiksen emphasized the crucial need for collaboration on defense and security matters in Northern Europe, reflecting the realities of evolving geopolitical relationships. Her reaction was spurred by a recent revelation of U.S. espionage activity, which reportedly involved the National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard directing officials to collect intelligence related to Greenland’s independence movement and its wealth of natural resources. This disclosure raised significant diplomatic concerns between the U.S. and Denmark, two nations that have long been regarded as close allies.
Diplomatic Strains and Security Cooperation
The growing tensions between the two countries prompted Denmark to summon the U.S. ambassador, seeking clarification on the reported surveillance operations. These actions underscore a disconcerting trend in international relations where the lines of trust may be blurred even among allies. The intent behind the U.S. intelligence activities was questioned, especially in light of a strong historical alliance between Denmark and the United States, which has traditionally relied on mutual respect and cooperation in defense and security matters.
Prime Minister Frederiksen’s insistence on the importance of collaborative security strategies emphasized that while intelligence-gathering is a common tactic among nations, spying on allies can undermine bilateral relationships. It raised questions about the ethical implications of such actions and whether they contribute positively to global stability or infringe upon national sovereignty and dignity.
Reactions from Greenland’s Leadership
The controversy reached a boiling point when Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen condemned the reported surveillance as “unacceptable and disrespectful.” He firmly reiterated that Greenland is not a commodity to be traded or used as leverage in international negotiations. This declaration highlighted the island’s desire for autonomy and respect in the global arena. Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, has seen increasing discussions about its independence—complicated by the region’s rich natural resources, which have become increasingly attractive amid the global race for energy and minerals.
In response to the growing media coverage and public concern, Gabbard’s office accused various media outlets of perpetuating what they termed as “deep state narratives,” suggesting that leaked information would be rigorously investigated. The U.S. response to these allegations sparked further debate around the legitimacy and methods of intelligence collection, especially in contexts involving allied nations.
Implications for Future Alliances
The interactions between the U.S. and Denmark highlight the potential for increasing diplomatic strain amid shifting geopolitical dynamics. As nations reassess their defense strategies and alliances in an ever-evolving global landscape, it is crucial to consider how actions—such as espionage—can significantly impact trust and cooperation.
For the United States and Denmark, the path forward requires a reconsideration of the principles that underpin their long-standing alliance. Both nations share common goals in terms of security, stability, and prosperity in the Arctic region and beyond. Moving forward, it may be essential for leaders to engage in dialogue that emphasizes transparency, respect, and partnership to ensure that such episodes of distrust are not repeated.
In conclusion, as the scenario surrounding U.S. intelligence operations in Greenland unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the need for integrity in international relations. The emphasis on mutual respect among allies is critical, particularly in times of uncertainty. As citizens and stakeholders, it is vital to remain informed and engaged in the conversations shaping our world today. Stay updated, take part in discussions on global diplomacy, and help foster stronger alliances for a peaceful future.
